Forcing companies to share infrastructure they’ve built at rates someone else sets will discourage investment and reduce productivity.

Protectionist policies pose a threat to everyone’s welfare. Policymakers should reject tariffs and negotiate free trade deals that open domestic markets and give market access to emerging economies.

Plutôt que de créer une nouvelle bureaucratie fédérale, une approche plus efficace et plus durable consisterait à réduire l’intervention gouvernementale et à laisser les promoteurs construire.

Freeing up the funds currently allocated to subsidies would allow us to reduce the provincial corporate tax rate by 6.75 percentage points, to 4.75 per cent from 11.5 per cent, without affecting government revenues at all.

While substantial progress has been made in terms of reliable access to drinking water, many households around the world still have to deal with uncertain access due to inadequate infrastructure.

Réformer la loi C-69 sur l’évaluation d’impact est un impératif pour le nouveau gouvernement libéral de Mark Carney, dans un contexte où les grands projets d’infrastructures, tant énergétiques que de transport, seront cruciaux pour l’avenir économique du Québec et du Canada.

In a time of sluggish productivity growth, internal trade liberalization may be one of the few policy tools available to drive lasting improvements—and quickly.

Voici les six questions que le gouvernement fédéral devrait se poser à propos de chaque règlement existant – ou envisagé.

It costs money and man hours for governments to enforce rules and for businesses to comply with them yet often there’s no clear benefit.

As we appear to be heading toward the second Canada Post strike in less than a year, the question now is whether we’ll be able to learn from our past mail mistakes or simply stay lost.