Le secteur public ne cesse de croître alors que le Québec fait face à un déficit historique, ce qui appelle à une révision complète des dépenses.

While it is not solely responsible for our stagnation, the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) remains an emblematic example of Ottawa’s tendency to overregulate at the expense of Canadians’ living standards.

Enchaîner les médecins à un système défaillant qui épuise son personnel soignant ne réglera pas nos problèmes. On devrait plutôt miser sur la flexibilité, comme l’a fait le Danemark.

Embracing economic nationalism will only make us poorer. If policymakers are serious about righting Canada’s growth trajectory, then a policy path of economic openness is the correct choice.

Lowering the second bracket to 15 per cent wouldn’t just help workers keep more of their money, it would spur job growth, innovation and economic dynamism.

While Mark Carney may use different words to promote them, his plans to grow Canada’s economy with government spending and deficits are eerily similar to those put forward ten years earlier by the very prime minister he is now hoping to replace.

The Quebec Premier’s usual strategy of sending out big cheques, this time to businesses affected by US tariffs, is a very costly one, especially as we don’t know whether these tariffs are going to be in place for a matter of days or for an entire year.

Dans leur empressement à imposer les véhicules électriques, il semble que les politiciens fédéraux ont omis de s’assurer que le Canada serait prêt à les accueillir.

Few Canadians are aware that it’s often easier for Canadian businesses to sell their goods in a neighbouring country, than in a neighbouring province. A new Nova Scotia law could change all that – if adopted across the country.

Trudeau touting that he “lowered taxes” on his way out just added insult to injury to a decade of rising tax burdens, inflation, and public services that are on the brink of collapse.