CRTC network‑sharing mandate could stall investment, hurt service quality and weaken Canada’s position in the digital economy. Canadians deserve better than a regulatory policy that prioritizes short‑term appearances over long‑term prosperity.

Governments promise the sun and the moon and when they inevitably fall short, we’re left with a tax bill we can ill afford and not much to show for it.

By adopting Bill C-5, the federal government is effectively admitting that the current major projects approval system is broken. Let’s unbreak it. Approvals in Canada must be swift by default, not by exception.

While Bill C-5 sends a positive signal, it does not resolve the core problem: Canada still lacks a stable, transparent, and efficient project approval process.

Chaque nouveau logement bâti, peu importe son niveau de prix, contribue à ramener les prix à des niveaux plus abordables tant à court terme qu’à long terme.

La multiplication des arrêts de travail au Québec atteint des records et le ministre du Travail, Jean Boulet, a raison de vouloir les limiter.

Forcing companies to share infrastructure they’ve built at rates someone else sets will discourage investment and reduce productivity.

Protectionist policies pose a threat to everyone’s welfare. Policymakers should reject tariffs and negotiate free trade deals that open domestic markets and give market access to emerging economies.

Plutôt que de créer une nouvelle bureaucratie fédérale, une approche plus efficace et plus durable consisterait à réduire l’intervention gouvernementale et à laisser les promoteurs construire.

Freeing up the funds currently allocated to subsidies would allow us to reduce the provincial corporate tax rate by 6.75 percentage points, to 4.75 per cent from 11.5 per cent, without affecting government revenues at all.