The Trudeau government has plans to impose a tax on digital services. The case for the targeted tax is weak. The consequences could be significant.

Given the choice, people prefer to live out their days in their homes, among their loved ones. We have the means to respect those preferences.

Souhaitez-vous réellement qu’une augmentation annuelle de 11,4 pour cent de votre facture d’épicerie devienne la nouvelle norme? C’est pour éviter cela que la banque centrale doit essayer de rattraper son retard.

Behind the high-minded slogans about “fair shares” and “making multinationals pay” hide two other facts: that it is once again, as always, taxpayers who will foot the bill, and that the hoped-for benefits will likely not materialize.

La province devrait bâtir un système de soins à domicile qui corresponde aux désirs de la population et qui réponde aux besoins des personnes âgées du Québec.

By creating a training program for caregivers and facilitating innovation within the home care network, more seniors will be able to experience the benefits of staying in their own homes as they age.

It’s time to redraw the balance between core and non-core policing activities—and, in doing so, make our communities safer while preserving public resources.

The fiscal loss from increasing the federal income tax rate from 33 to 25 percent is estimated at $212 million a year.

Au lieu de chercher à augmenter le fardeau fiscal des riches simplement parce qu’ils sont riches, le gouvernement du Canada devrait d’abord considérer tous les tenants et aboutissants des mesures qu’il envisage.

The prospective rate represents a very different way of looking at inflation, one that turns out to be far more reflective of Canadians’ lived experience.